From 209ac98819b0f6f6311afbc9ab362b251ccc668f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pragmaticplay0725 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:21:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add The History Of Pragmatic In 10 Milestones --- The-History-Of-Pragmatic-In-10-Milestones.md | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) create mode 100644 The-History-Of-Pragmatic-In-10-Milestones.md diff --git a/The-History-Of-Pragmatic-In-10-Milestones.md b/The-History-Of-Pragmatic-In-10-Milestones.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a265960 --- /dev/null +++ b/The-History-Of-Pragmatic-In-10-Milestones.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +Pragmatism and the Illegal + +Pragmatism can be characterized as both a normative and descriptive theory. As a description theory it asserts that the traditional view of jurisprudence may not be accurate and that legal pragmatics is a better option. + +Particularly the area of legal pragmatism, it rejects the notion that right decisions can be determined from a fundamental principle or set of principles. It favors a practical approach that is based on context. + +What is Pragmatism? + +Pragmatism is a philosophy that developed during the latter part of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It was the first North American philosophical movement. (It must be noted that some adherents of existentialism were also known as "pragmatists") The pragmaticists, as with many other major philosophical movements throughout history were in part influenced by discontent with the situation in the world and the past. + +It is a challenge to give an exact definition of the term "pragmatism. One of the main features that is frequently associated as pragmatism is that it focuses on the results and consequences. This is sometimes contrasted with other philosophical traditions that have more of a theoretical approach to truth and knowledge. + +Charles Sanders Peirce is credited as the inventor of the concept of pragmatism in relation to philosophy. He believed that only what can be independently verified and proven through practical experiments is true or authentic. Peirce also stressed that the only true method to comprehend something was to look at its impact on others. + +John Dewey, an educator and philosopher who lived from 1859 to 1952, was a second pioneering pragmatist. He developed a more holistic approach to pragmatism. This included connections with education, society, and art, as well as politics. He was influenced by Peirce, and the German idealists Wilhelm von Humboldt und Friedrich Hegel. + +The pragmatists had a looser definition of what constitutes truth. It was not intended to be a position of relativity, but rather an attempt to attain a higher level of clarity and solidly accepted beliefs. This was accomplished by combining practical knowledge with logical reasoning. + +Putnam extended this neopragmatic method to be described more broadly as internal Realism. This was a different approach to correspondence theories of truth, which dispensed with the goal of achieving an external God's eye point of view while retaining truth's objectivity, albeit inside a theory or description. It was an advanced version of the ideas of Peirce and James. + +What is Pragmatism's Theory of Decision-Making? + +A legal pragmatist views law as a method to solve problems, not as a set rules. He or she rejects the classical notion of deductive certainty and instead focuses on context in decision-making. Legal pragmatists argue that the idea of fundamental principles is a misguided idea as in general these principles will be disproved by actual practice. Therefore, a pragmatic approach is superior to the classical view of the process of legal decision-making. + +The pragmatist view is broad and has inspired various theories, including those in ethics, science, philosophy, sociology, political theory and even politics. Although Charles Sanders Peirce deserves most of the credit for pragmatism and his pragmatic principle - a rule for clarifying the meaning of hypotheses by tracing their practical consequences is the core of the doctrine but the concept has since expanded significantly to encompass a wide range of views. The doctrine has been expanded to encompass a variety of perspectives and beliefs, including the notion that a philosophy theory is only valid if it is useful and that knowledge is more than just an abstract representation of the world. + +Although the pragmatics have contributed to many areas of philosophy, they are not without critics. The pragmatists rejecting the concept of a priori propositional knowledge has resulted in a ferocious, influential critique of analytical philosophy. This critique has spread across the entire field of philosophy to various social disciplines like political science, jurisprudence and a number of other social sciences. + +However, it's difficult to classify a pragmatic conception of law as a descriptive theory. The majority of judges behave as if they follow an empiricist logical framework that is based on precedent and traditional legal sources for their decisions. However, a legal pragmatist may well argue that this model does not adequately reflect the real-time the judicial decision-making process. It is more appropriate to see a pragmatic approach to law as a normative model which provides a guideline on how law should evolve and be taken into account. + +What is the Pragmatism Theory of Conflict Resolution? + +Pragmatism is a philosophy that views knowledge of the world as inseparable from the agency within it. It is interpreted in many different ways, usually at odds with each other. It is sometimes viewed as a response to analytic philosophy while at other times, it is regarded as an alternative to continental thought. It is a tradition that is growing and developing. + +The pragmatists wanted to emphasise the value of experiences and the importance of the individual's own mind in the formation of beliefs. They also wanted to correct what they believed to be the errors of a dated philosophical tradition that had distorted earlier thinkers' work. These errors included Cartesianism and Nominalism, and a misunderstanding of the role of human reasoning. + +All pragmatists are skeptical about the unquestioned and non-experimental representations of reasoning. They are also cautious of any argument that claims that "it works" or "we have always done this way' are valid. For the legal pragmatist these assertions can be interpreted as being overly legalistic, naively rationalist and not critical of the previous practices. + +Contrary to the traditional conception of law as an unwritten set of rules the pragmaticist emphasizes the importance of context when making legal decisions. It will also acknowledge the fact that there are a variety of ways to describe law, and that these different interpretations must be taken into consideration. This perspective, referred to as perspectivalism, may make the legal pragmatic appear less reliant to precedents and previously accepted analogies. + +The legal pragmatist's view acknowledges that judges don't have access to a core set of fundamentals from which they could make well-thought-out decisions in all instances. The pragmatist is therefore keen to emphasize the importance of knowing the facts before making a decision and will be willing to modify a legal rule if it is not working. + +There is no accepted definition of what a legal pragmatist should look like, there are certain features which tend to characterise this stance on philosophy. They include a focus on context and a rejection of any attempt to derive laws from abstract concepts that cannot be tested in a specific instance. In addition, the pragmatist will recognize that the law is constantly changing and there will be no single correct picture of it. + +What is the Pragmatism Theory of Justice? + +Legal pragmatics as a judicial system has been lauded for its ability to effect social changes. However, it is also criticized as an approach to avoiding legitimate moral and philosophical disputes and placing them in the realm of legal decision-making. The pragmatic is not interested in relegating philosophical debate to the realm of the law and instead takes a pragmatic approach to these disagreements, which stresses contextual sensitivity, the importance of an open-ended approach to knowledge and the acceptance that perspectives are inevitable. + +The majority of legal pragmatists don't believe in an idea of a foundationalist model of legal decision-making and rely on traditional legal materials to establish the basis for judging current cases. They believe that the cases alone are not enough to provide a solid foundation for analyzing legal decisions. Therefore, they need to supplement the case with other sources such as analogies or concepts that are derived from precedent. + +The legal pragmatist likewise rejects the idea that good decisions can be determined from an overarching set of fundamental principles and argues that such a scenario makes judges unable to base their decisions on predetermined "rules." Instead she favors a method that recognizes the omnipotent influence of context. + +In light of the skepticism and anti-realism that characterize Neo-pragmatism, a lot of legal pragmatists have adopted a more deflationist position toward the notion of truth. By focusing on the way concepts are used, describing its function, and establishing criteria for recognizing that a concept has that purpose, they have been able to suggest that this is all philosophers could reasonably expect from the theory of truth. + +Other pragmatists, however, [프라그마틱 체험](https://pragmatickr.com/) have taken a much broader view of truth that they have described as an objective standard for assertion and inquiry. This approach combines elements of pragmatism and classical realist and Idealist philosophy. It is also in line with the more pragmatic tradition, which regards truth as an objective standard for inquiry and assertion, not merely a standard for justification or warranted affirmability (or its derivatives). This holistic conception of truth has been described as an "instrumental theory of truth" because it aims to define truth in terms of the goals and values that guide one's involvement with the world. \ No newline at end of file